Thursday, October 11, 2012
10/11 Homework
Okay, so here are the two questions that I was talking about at the end of class. Remember, you don't need to write out fancy-shmancy answers--just notes will do.
We'll discuss these tomorrow. Also, remember that I'm bringing pizza for lunch tomorrow--just bring whatever you'd like to drink.
· It’s easy to get caught up in Victor, the monster, and
Walton; what is the meaning behind the roles of the ancillary characters:
Justine, Elizabeth, Clerval, William, Victor’s professors (Krempe and Waldman) and
the cottagers (Mr.
DeLacey, Felix, Agatha, and Safie)? (You only have to focus on the character that you picked in class--Hanna, you have William.)
· Unlike when Gardner crafted Grendel, when creating
her characters, Shelley employed many archetypes: the beautiful, innocent
woman; the mad scientist; the orphan; the tragic hero; the faithful sidekick. These characters are not unique; as archetypes,
their defining character traits have been used over and over in different
pieces of literature. (We’ve already
seen this proven true through the Prometheus, Paradise Lost, and “Mariner” connections.) What is the benefit in
doing this? Why is the use of archetypes
so applicable to her story and purpose? (This one's not about individual characters, but the group of characters as a whole.)